Saving what we love" also makes NO sense because Finn was trying to save the entire Resistance.
Rose stopping Finn from ramming the siege cannon turns out not to matter because the Resistance still gets out alive, but this entire scene is horribly written and the character that causes problems here is Rose. If this is true, then don't write him into this situation in the first place. A common attack on this argument is that "Finn's a main character and should survive until at least TRoS". Not only should this have killed both of them, it denies Finn a fitting end to his character arc. I understand that she grew up without massive trappings of wealth, but the beautiful casinos and alien designs would have been much nicer if Rose wasn't surly the entire time.īut the scene that really ticked me off was when she T-bones his speeder on Crait. While the existence of the Canto Bight scene is debatable, that's not an argument I'm making- I'm saying that Rose's demeanor and attitude toward Canto Bight are unfounded and incorrect. Count DOoku himself is an example of a character that has wealth (from his title on Serenno) without selling weapons. That doesn't make any sense look to today's world, where arms sales aren't dominating the global economy.
On Canto Bight, she becomes furious at the people there because "there's only one way they get this rich- selling weapons". Her portrayal as a moral philosopher makes me irritated because her viewpoint is, quite frankly, bullshit. I do, however, object to the substance of her character and her traits. I have nothing against Asian people and/or women, and I don't object to the existence of Rose Tico.
Before you sic the "racist/misogynist" dogs on me, let me just make one thing clear.
0 kommentar(er)
